Investigation of the Progressive Collapse Potential in Steel Buildings with Composite Floor System.

Document Type : Original Manuscript

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran

2 Department of Civil Engineering,Iran university of Science & Technology

Abstract

Abnormal loads due to natural events, implementation errors and some other issues can lead to occurrence of progressive collapse in structures. Most of the past researches consist of 2- Dimensional (2D) models of steel frames without consideration of the floor system effects, which reduces the accuracy of the modeling. While employing a 3-Dimensional (3D) model and modeling the concrete slab system for the floors have a crucial role in the progressive collapse evaluation. In this research, a 3D finite element model of a 5-story steel building is modeled by the ABAQUS software once with modeling the slabs, and the next time without considering them. Then, the progressive collapse potential is evaluated. The results of the analyses indicate that the lack of the consideration of the slabs during the analyses, can lead to inaccuracy in assessing the progressive failure potential of the structure. The results show that a structure is subjected to unusual external loads such as a motor vehicle collision, explosion of a bomb in a vehicle, etc., the most critical columns are located in the nearest frame to the outer frame in the structure.

Keywords


 References
[1]ASCE/SEI 7-05. Minimum design for buildings and
other structures. Reston (Virginia): American
Society of Civil Engineers; 2010.
[2]Bezant ZP, Verdure M., ―Mechanics of progressive
collapse: learning from World Trade Center and
building demolitions‖, Journal of Engineering
Mechanics; 2007, 133(3): 308–19.
[3]Burnet. E. ―The Avoidance of progressive collapse:
Regulatory Approaches to The Problem‖, National
Bureau of Standards, Washington 1975.
[4]Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. The building
regulations 2000, Part A, Schedule1: A3,
Disproportionate collapse. London (UK); 2004.
[5]British Standards Institution. BS 5950: Structural
use of steelwork in buildings, Part 1: Code of
practice for design — rolled and welded sections,
London (UK); 2000.
[6]Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC)-DoD. Design of
Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse,
Department of Defense; 2005.
[7]GSA. Progressive collapse analysis and design
guidelines for new federal office buildings and
major modernization projects. The U.S. General
Services Administration; 2003.
[8]Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
FEMA 403, World Trade Center Building
Performance Study: Data Collection, Preliminary
Observations, and Recommendations. Washington,
DC, USA; 2002.
[9]National Institute of Science and Technology
(NIST). Final Report on the Collapse of the World
Trade Center Towers. NCSTAR 1, Federal Building
and Fire 318 Safety Investigation of the World
Trade Center Disaster. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: US
[10]Department of Commerce; 2005.
FEMA 274. NEHRP Commentary on the guidelines
for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings.
Washington DC: Federal Emergency Management
Agency; 1997.
[11]Kaewkulchai Griengsak, Williamson Eric B. Beam
element formulation and solution procedure for
dynamic progressive collapse analysis. Computers
and Structures; 2004; 82(7–8):639–51.
[12]Powell GP. ‗Progressive Collapse: Case studies
Using Nonlinear Analysis‘, Proceedings of the 2005
Structures Congress and the 2005 Forensic
Engineering Symposium; New York, USA; 2005.
20–24.
[13]Khandelwal Kapil, El-TawilSherif, SadekFahim.
Progressive collapse analysis of seismically
designed steel braced frames. Journal of
Constructional Steel Research
2009; 5(3): 699–708.
[14]Kim Jinkoo, Kim Taewan. Assessment of
progressive collapse-resisting capacity of steel
moment frames. Journal of Constructional Steel
Research; 2009; 65(1): 169–79.
[15]Tsai Meng-Hao, Lin Bing-Hui. Investigation of
progressive collapse resistance and inelastic
response for an earthquake-resistant RC building
subjected to column failure. Engineering Structures;
2008, 30(12): 3619–28.
[16]Liu JL. Preventing progressive collapse through
strengthening beam-to-column connection, Part 1:
theoretical analysis. Journal of Constructional Steel
Research, 2010; 66(2): 229–37.
[17]Yanchao Shi, Zhong-Xian Li, Hong Hao. A new
method for progressive collapse analysis of RC
frames under blast loading. Engineering Structures,
2010; 32(6): 1691–703.
[18]Talaat Mohamed, Mosalam Khalid M. Modeling
progressive collapse in reinforced concrete buildings
using direct element removal. Earthquake
Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2009; 38(5):
609–34.
[19]ABAQUS theory manual. Pawtucket, R.I: Hibbitt,
Karlsson and Sorensen, Inc.; 2010. Version 6.10.
[20]Feng Fu. Progressive collapse analysis of high-rise
building with 3-D finite element modeling method.
Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009;
65(6): 1269–78.
[21]Feng Fu. Response of a multi-story steel composite
building with concentric bracing under consecutive
column removal scenarios. Journal of
Constructional Steel Research, 2012; 70: 115-126.
[22]Iranian National Building Code, Chapter 10, Design
and Construction of Steel Structures. Ministry of
Roads and Urban Development, Department of
National Building Regulations Affairs, 2008.
[23]K. Pouya, G. A.Gholamreza
8
Computers and Structures, Inc. ETABS Analysis
Reference Manual Version 9.7.4., Computers and
Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California; 2011.
[24]Iranian National Building Code, Chapter 6, Loads
on Building. Ministry of Roads and Urban
Development, Department of National Building
Regulations Affairs, 2007.
[25]Iranian National Building Code, Chapter 21, Passive
Defense. Ministry of Roads and Urban
Development, Department of National Building
Regulations Affairs, 2013.
[26]Richard, L., Hong, C. Explosion and Fire Analysis
of steel Frames Using Fiber Element Approach.
Structural Engineering (ASCE); 2004, 130(7): 991-
1000.
[27]Jinkoo Kim, Taewan Kim, Assessment of
progressive collapse-resisting capacity of steel
moment frames. Journal of Constructional Steel
Research; 2009, 65(1):169–179.